Hilton vs South Fremantle, WA suburb comparison

South Fremantle for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HiltonSouth Fremantle

Overall score

Hilton

52.7/100

South Fremantle

68.8/100

Crime rate

Hilton

2641.8 / 1k

South Fremantle

3365.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hilton

128

South Fremantle

227

Population

Hilton

4,323

South Fremantle

3,398

Metric leadHilton 4South Fremantle 6across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHiltonSouth Fremantle
Overall score52.7/10068.8/100
Housing (desirability)30.2/10067.2/100
Crime rate2641.8 / 1k3365.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools106
Parks & reserves37
Public transport stops3417
Walkability53.0/10095.5/100
Nearby amenities128227
Population4,3233,398
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Hilton reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; South Fremantle is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where South Fremantle is shaped by the coast, Hilton offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

On the data, Hilton is stronger for a quieter safety profile and public transport access; South Fremantle answers with housing affordability and parks and reserves.

Households prioritising schools may find Hilton the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer South Fremantle.

Related comparisons