Hilton vs North Fremantle, WA suburb comparison

Hilton for families and schools; North Fremantle for retirees and beach lifestyle.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

HiltonNorth Fremantle

Overall score

Hilton

52.7/100

North Fremantle

58.0/100

Crime rate

Hilton

2641.8 / 1k

North Fremantle

2828.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hilton

128

North Fremantle

206

Population

Hilton

4,323

North Fremantle

3,947

Metric leadHilton 4North Fremantle 6across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHiltonNorth Fremantle
Overall score52.7/10058.0/100
Housing (desirability)30.2/10049.8/100
Crime rate2641.8 / 1k2828.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools106
Parks & reserves39
Public transport stops3419
Walkability53.0/10073.5/100
Nearby amenities128206
Planning activity1
Population4,3233,947
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Hilton is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and North Fremantle is a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone. Where North Fremantle is shaped by the coast, Hilton offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Hilton tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, while North Fremantle stands out for housing affordability and parks and reserves.

Hilton suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas North Fremantle is the stronger match for retirees and people chasing a beach lifestyle.

Related comparisons