Beaconsfield vs North Fremantle, WA suburb comparison

Beaconsfield for families and schools; North Fremantle for retirees and beach lifestyle.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BeaconsfieldNorth Fremantle

Overall score

Beaconsfield

57.0/100

North Fremantle

58.0/100

Crime rate

Beaconsfield

2118.5 / 1k

North Fremantle

2828.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Beaconsfield

200

North Fremantle

206

Population

Beaconsfield

5,315

North Fremantle

3,947

Metric leadBeaconsfield 5North Fremantle 5across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBeaconsfieldNorth Fremantle
Overall score57.0/10058.0/100
Housing (desirability)20.4/10049.8/100
Crime rate2118.5 / 1k2828.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools116
Parks & reserves69
Public transport stops3319
Walkability86.0/10073.5/100
Nearby amenities200206
Planning activity1
Population5,3153,947
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Beaconsfield reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; North Fremantle is a beachside mid-sized suburb where the coast sets the tone. North Fremantle leans into coastal living, while Beaconsfield feels more inland and suburban in character.

Beaconsfield tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, while North Fremantle stands out for housing affordability and parks and reserves.

Beaconsfield suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas North Fremantle is the stronger match for retirees and people chasing a beach lifestyle.

Related comparisons

Beaconsfield vs North Fremantle, WA suburb… | Suburb Guide