Beaconsfield vs North Fremantle, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Beaconsfield | North Fremantle |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.6/100 | 58.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 20.4/100 | 49.8/100 |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | 9 |
| Public transport stops | 33 | 19 |
| Walkability | 86.0/100 | 73.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 200 | 206 |
| Planning activity | — | 1 |
| Population | 5,315 | 3,947 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesNorth Fremantle
- Best for familiesBeaconsfield
- Best for beach lifestyleNorth Fremantle
- Best for investmentNorth Fremantle
- Best for best valueNorth Fremantle
- Best for best schoolsBeaconsfield
Comparison summary
Beaconsfield (WA) and North Fremantle offer different strengths across official suburb data. North Fremantle leads on more comparison categories overall. Overall score favours North Fremantle; Housing (desirability) favours North Fremantle; Parks & reserves favours North Fremantle. Quick verdicts: Retirees → North Fremantle, Families → Beaconsfield (WA), Beach lifestyle → North Fremantle, Investment → North Fremantle.