Beaconsfield vs Samson, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Beaconsfield | Samson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.6/100 | 36.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 20.4/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 6 | — |
| Public transport stops | 33 | 14 |
| Walkability | 86.0/100 | 21.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 200 | 24 |
| Population | 5,315 | 1,881 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesBeaconsfield
- Best for familiesBeaconsfield
- Best for investmentSamson
- Best for best valueSamson
- Best for best schoolsBeaconsfield
Comparison summary
Beaconsfield (WA) and Samson offer different strengths across official suburb data. Beaconsfield (WA) leads on more comparison categories overall. Overall score favours Beaconsfield (WA); Housing (desirability) favours Samson; Public transport stops favours Beaconsfield (WA). Quick verdicts: Retirees → Beaconsfield (WA), Families → Beaconsfield (WA), Investment → Samson, Best value → Samson.