Fremantle vs Hilton, WA suburb comparison

Fremantle for beach lifestyle and investment; Hilton for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FremantleHilton

Overall score

Fremantle

71.4/100

Hilton

52.7/100

Crime rate

Fremantle

1169.0 / 1k

Hilton

2641.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Fremantle

930

Hilton

128

Population

Fremantle

9,251

Hilton

4,323

Metric leadFremantle 9Hilton 1across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFremantleHilton
Overall score71.4/10052.7/100
Housing (desirability)51.0/10030.2/100
Crime rate1169.0 / 1k2641.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools910
Parks & reserves113
Public transport stops8034
Walkability100.0/10053.0/100
Nearby amenities930128
Population9,2514,323
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Fremantle is a beachside established suburb where the coast sets the tone, and Hilton is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Fremantle leans into coastal living, while Hilton feels more inland and suburban in character.

On the data, Fremantle is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Hilton answers with excellent public transport and improving crime trends.

People chasing a beach lifestyle and investors may find Fremantle the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Hilton.

Related comparisons