Overall score
Bell Park
48.0/100
Manifold Heights
50.7/100
Bell Park for retirees and value; Manifold Heights for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Bell Park
48.0/100
Manifold Heights
50.7/100
Crime rate
Bell Park
83.3 / 1k
Manifold Heights
65.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bell Park
147
Manifold Heights
138
Population
Bell Park
5,602
Manifold Heights
2,681
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bell Park | Manifold Heights |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.0/100 | 50.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 70.1/100 | 55.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 83.3 / 1k | 65.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 13 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 26 | 17 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 33.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 147 | 138 |
| Planning activity | 48 | 15 |
| Green cover | 6.8% | 0.2% |
| Population | 5,602 | 2,681 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 9/10 |
Bell Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Manifold Heights is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Manifold Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Bell Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Bell Park is stronger for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Manifold Heights answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Bell Park sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Manifold Heights.
Bell Park suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Manifold Heights is the stronger match for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.