Bend Of Islands vs Kangaroo Ground, VIC Suburb Comparison

Kangaroo Ground for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Bend Of IslandsKangaroo Ground

Overall score

Bend Of Islands

51.3/100

Kangaroo Ground

57.9/100

Crime rate

Bend Of Islands

28.2 / 1k

Kangaroo Ground

53.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bend Of Islands

5

Kangaroo Ground

23

Population

Bend Of Islands

267

Kangaroo Ground

1,208

Metric leadBend Of Islands 4Kangaroo Ground 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBend Of IslandsKangaroo Ground
Overall score51.3/10057.9/100
Housing (desirability)41.8/10038.5/100
Crime rate28.2 / 1k53.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves25
Public transport stops—12
Walkability0.0/10022.0/100
Nearby amenities523
Planning activity735
Green cover87.2%25.2%
Population2671,208
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Bend Of Islands is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Kangaroo Ground is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood. Kangaroo Ground sits among greener hillside streets, while Bend Of Islands keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Bend Of Islands pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Kangaroo Ground is the better pick for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and walkability.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kangaroo Ground, while Bend Of Islands remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons