Overall score
Kangaroo Ground
57.9/100
North Warrandyte
57.5/100
Kangaroo Ground for retirees and families; North Warrandyte for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kangaroo Ground
57.9/100
North Warrandyte
57.5/100
Crime rate
Kangaroo Ground
53.3 / 1k
North Warrandyte
14.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kangaroo Ground
23
North Warrandyte
17
Population
Kangaroo Ground
1,208
North Warrandyte
3,027
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kangaroo Ground | North Warrandyte |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.9/100 | 57.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 38.5/100 | 46.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 53.3 / 1k | 14.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 12 | 30 |
| Walkability | 22.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 23 | 17 |
| Planning activity | 35 | 91 |
| Green cover | 25.2% | 18.1% |
| Population | 1,208 | 3,027 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Kangaroo Ground is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, while North Warrandyte is a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand. Kangaroo Ground sits among greener hillside streets, while North Warrandyte keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Kangaroo Ground pulls ahead on parks and reserves, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas North Warrandyte is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer North Warrandyte, while Kangaroo Ground remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.