Kangaroo Ground vs Research, VIC Suburb Comparison

Kangaroo Ground for value; Research for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Kangaroo GroundResearch

Overall score

Kangaroo Ground

57.9/100

Research

64.0/100

Crime rate

Kangaroo Ground

53.3 / 1k

Research

24.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kangaroo Ground

23

Research

42

Population

Kangaroo Ground

1,208

Research

2,695

Metric leadKangaroo Ground 3Research 82 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKangaroo GroundResearch
Overall score57.9/10064.0/100
Housing (desirability)38.5/10049.2/100
Crime rate53.3 / 1k24.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves53
Public transport stops1216
Walkability22.0/10026.0/100
Nearby amenities2342
Planning activity3560
Green cover25.2%11.6%
Population1,2082,695
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Kangaroo Ground is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, while Research is a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand. Kangaroo Ground sits among greener hillside streets, while Research keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Kangaroo Ground pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Research is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access.

Kangaroo Ground suits value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Research is the stronger match for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons