Berowra Heights vs Dangar Island, NSW Suburb Comparison

Berowra Heights for investment and value; Dangar Island for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Berowra HeightsDangar Island

Overall score

Berowra Heights

60.5/100

Dangar Island

49.9/100

Crime rate

Berowra Heights

13.0 / 1k

Dangar Island

108.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Berowra Heights

71

Dangar Island

22

Population

Berowra Heights

5,286

Dangar Island

313

Metric leadBerowra Heights 8Dangar Island 22 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBerowra HeightsDangar Island
Overall score60.5/10049.9/100
Housing (desirability)54.7/10046.4/100
Crime rate13.0 / 1k108.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools2—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves31
Public transport stops651
Walkability78.0/1005.5/100
Nearby amenities7122
Planning activity263
Green cover0.7%82.6%
Population5,286313
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Berowra Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Dangar Island is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote. Berowra Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Dangar Island keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Berowra Heights pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves, whereas Dangar Island is the better pick for a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Berowra Heights, while Dangar Island remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons