Berowra Heights vs Mount Kuring-Gai, NSW Suburb Comparison

Mount Kuring-Gai for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Berowra HeightsMount Kuring-Gai

Overall score

Berowra Heights

60.5/100

Mount Kuring-Gai

64.3/100

Crime rate

Berowra Heights

13.0 / 1k

Mount Kuring-Gai

24.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Berowra Heights

71

Mount Kuring-Gai

46

Population

Berowra Heights

5,286

Mount Kuring-Gai

1,766

Metric leadBerowra Heights 8Mount Kuring-Gai 32 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBerowra HeightsMount Kuring-Gai
Overall score60.5/10064.3/100
Housing (desirability)54.7/10051.1/100
Crime rate13.0 / 1k24.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools21
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves31
Public transport stops6538
Walkability78.0/10070.0/100
Nearby amenities7146
Planning activity2615
Green cover0.7%19.3%
Population5,2861,766
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Berowra Heights is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Mount Kuring-Gai is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Berowra Heights sits within day-trip reach of the capital, whereas Mount Kuring-Gai is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Berowra Heights is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves; Mount Kuring-Gai answers with housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Mount Kuring-Gai, while Berowra Heights remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons