Binjura vs Cooma, NSW suburb comparison

Binjura for retirees; Cooma for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BinjuraCooma

Overall score

Binjura

32.5/100

Cooma

57.3/100

Crime rate

Binjura

51.6 / 1k

Cooma

52.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Binjura

2

Cooma

47

Population

Binjura

339

Cooma

6,715

Metric leadBinjura 4Cooma 6across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBinjuraCooma
Overall score32.5/10057.3/100
Housing (desirability)68.2/10063.7/100
Crime rate51.6 / 1k52.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools2
Parks & reserves117
Public transport stops8297
Walkability12.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities247
Planning activity233
Population3396,715
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/104/10

Comparison summary

Binjura is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Cooma is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

Binjura pulls ahead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Cooma is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves. Binjura generally means more sought-after housing, while Cooma leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Choose Binjura if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Cooma for families and investors.

Related comparisons