Bredbo vs Cooma, NSW suburb comparison

Bredbo for retirees and investment; Cooma for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BredboCooma

Overall score

Bredbo

43.5/100

Cooma

57.3/100

Crime rate

Bredbo

32.3 / 1k

Cooma

52.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bredbo

0

Cooma

47

Population

Bredbo

392

Cooma

6,715

Metric leadBredbo 4Cooma 7across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBredboCooma
Overall score43.5/10057.3/100
Housing (desirability)68.9/10063.7/100
Crime rate32.3 / 1k52.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools12
Parks & reserves117
Public transport stops21297
Walkability30.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities047
Planning activity734
Population3926,715
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/104/10

Comparison summary

Bredbo is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, while Cooma is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

On the data, Bredbo is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Cooma answers with schools and education options and parks and reserves.

Retirees and investors may find Bredbo the better fit, while families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Cooma.

Related comparisons