Cooma vs Nimmitabel, NSW suburb comparison

Cooma for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CoomaNimmitabel

Overall score

Cooma

57.3/100

Nimmitabel

33.6/100

Crime rate

Cooma

52.2 / 1k

Nimmitabel

48.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cooma

47

Nimmitabel

32

Population

Cooma

6,715

Nimmitabel

324

Metric leadCooma 8Nimmitabel 3across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCoomaNimmitabel
Overall score57.3/10033.6/100
Housing (desirability)63.7/10038.9/100
Crime rate52.2 / 1k48.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools21
Parks & reserves172
Public transport stops29722
Walkability32.0/10036.0/100
Nearby amenities4732
Planning activity341
Population6,715324
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/102/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Cooma is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Nimmitabel is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace. Cooma sits more regionally self-contained, whereas Nimmitabel is further into the wider countryside.

Cooma tends to lead on housing affordability and schools and education options, while Nimmitabel stands out for a quieter safety profile and walkability. On housing, Cooma sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Nimmitabel.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Cooma, while Nimmitabel remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons

Cooma vs Nimmitabel, NSW suburb comparison | Suburb Guide