Overall score
Blackrock
41.7/100
Trebonne
31.5/100
Blackrock vs Trebonne, QLD Suburb Comparison
Blackrock for investment and value; Trebonne for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BlackrockTrebonne
Crime rate
Blackrock
76.9 / 1k
Trebonne
79.2 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Blackrock
0
Trebonne
0
Population
Blackrock
319
Trebonne
430
Metric leadBlackrock 5Trebonne 13 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Blackrock | Trebonne |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.7/100 | 31.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 60.2/100 | 42.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 76.9 / 1k | 79.2 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 29.4/100 | 29.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 0 |
| Green cover | 0.6% | 0.0% |
| Population | 319 | 430 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 3/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Blackrock is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, and Trebonne is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Blackrock sits further into the wider countryside, whereas Trebonne is more remote from the capital.
Blackrock tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability, while Trebonne stands out for a larger local community. Blackrock generally means more mid-market housing value, while Trebonne leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Blackrock suits retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Trebonne is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.