Blairmount vs Kearns, NSW Suburb Comparison

Kearns for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BlairmountKearns

Overall score

Blairmount

26.4/100

Kearns

44.0/100

Crime rate

Blairmount

86.8 / 1k

Kearns

34.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Blairmount

8

Kearns

27

Population

Blairmount

409

Kearns

2,693

Metric leadBlairmount 1Kearns 101 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBlairmountKearns
Overall score26.4/10044.0/100
Housing (desirability)41.0/10044.9/100
Crime rate86.8 / 1k34.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools56
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves—2
Public transport stops429
Walkability6.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities827
Planning activity24
Green cover0.9%6.4%
Population4092,693
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/106/10

Comparison summary

Blairmount reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Kearns is a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand. Blairmount sits among greener hillside streets, while Kearns keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Blairmount pulls ahead on housing affordability, whereas Kearns is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access. Blairmount generally means more approachable housing costs, while Kearns leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Kearns, while Blairmount remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons