Overall score
Blairmount
28.6/100
Kearns
45.9/100
Blairmount vs Kearns, NSW suburb comparison
Kearns for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BlairmountKearns
Crime rate
Blairmount
86.8 / 1k
Kearns
34.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Blairmount
5
Kearns
25
Population
Blairmount
409
Kearns
2,693
Metric leadBlairmount 1Kearns 9across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Blairmount | Kearns |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 28.6/100 | 45.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 62.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 86.8 / 1k | 34.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 4 | 29 |
| Walkability | 6.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 5 | 25 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 1 |
| Population | 409 | 2,693 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Blairmount reads as a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace; Kearns is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel. Blairmount sits among greener hillside streets, while Kearns keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Blairmount pulls ahead on housing affordability, whereas Kearns is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and public transport access. Blairmount generally means more approachable housing costs, while Kearns leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Kearns, while Blairmount remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.