Overall score
Claymore
35.1/100
Kearns
45.9/100
Claymore vs Kearns, NSW suburb comparison
Kearns for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ClaymoreKearns
Crime rate
Claymore
86.4 / 1k
Kearns
34.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Claymore
41
Kearns
25
Population
Claymore
2,579
Kearns
2,693
Metric leadClaymore 4Kearns 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
Comparison summary
Claymore reads as a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible; Kearns is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel. Claymore sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Kearns is further out with more breathing room.
Claymore tends to lead on parks and reserves and public transport access, while Kearns stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Claymore generally means more approachable housing costs, while Kearns leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Kearns, while Claymore remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.