Claymore vs Leumeah, NSW Suburb Comparison

Leumeah for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClaymoreLeumeah

Overall score

Claymore

28.7/100

Leumeah

41.1/100

Crime rate

Claymore

86.4 / 1k

Leumeah

123.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Claymore

45

Leumeah

241

Population

Claymore

2,579

Leumeah

9,992

Metric leadClaymore 3Leumeah 91 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClaymoreLeumeah
Overall score28.7/10041.1/100
Housing (desirability)9.1/10060.2/100
Crime rate86.4 / 1k123.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools69
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves516
Public transport stops36169
Walkability55.0/10042.0/100
Nearby amenities45241
Planning activity5217
Green cover17.3%12.8%
Population2,5799,992
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/102/10

Comparison summary

Claymore is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Leumeah is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Claymore pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, whereas Leumeah is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves. On housing, Claymore sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Leumeah.

Claymore suits families more clearly, whereas Leumeah is the stronger match for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons