Overall score
Claymore
35.1/100
Leumeah
48.3/100
Claymore for families; Leumeah for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Claymore
35.1/100
Leumeah
48.3/100
Crime rate
Claymore
86.4 / 1k
Leumeah
123.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Claymore
41
Leumeah
240
Population
Claymore
2,579
Leumeah
9,992
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Claymore | Leumeah |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.1/100 | 48.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 10.7/100 | 61.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 86.4 / 1k | 123.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 16 |
| Public transport stops | 36 | 169 |
| Walkability | 55.0/100 | 42.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 41 | 240 |
| Planning activity | 21 | 12 |
| Population | 2,579 | 9,992 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 2/10 |
Claymore is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, while Leumeah is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Claymore pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, whereas Leumeah is the better pick for housing affordability and schools and education options.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Leumeah, while Claymore remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.