Bondoola vs Taroomball, QLD suburb comparison

Taroomball for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BondoolaTaroomball

Overall score

Bondoola

33.8/100

Taroomball

35.5/100

Crime rate

Bondoola

36.4 / 1k

Taroomball

37.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bondoola

0

Taroomball

1

Population

Bondoola

551

Taroomball

1,136

Metric leadBondoola 1Taroomball 51 tiedacross 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBondoolaTaroomball
Overall score33.8/10035.5/100
Housing (desirability)70.6/10072.6/100
Crime rate36.4 / 1k37.1 / 1k
Parks & reserves1
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities01
Population5511,136
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/107/10

Comparison summary

Bondoola is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds, while Taroomball is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Bondoola tends to lead on a country-town feel, while Taroomball stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Taroomball, while Bondoola remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons