Mulambin vs Taroomball, QLD Suburb Comparison

Mulambin for beach lifestyle; Taroomball for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MulambinTaroomball

Overall score

Mulambin

29.1/100

Taroomball

38.7/100

Crime rate

Mulambin

64.1 / 1k

Taroomball

63.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mulambin

10

Taroomball

3

Population

Mulambin

917

Taroomball

1,136

Metric leadMulambin 1Taroomball 62 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMulambinTaroomball
Overall score29.1/10038.7/100
Housing (desirability)40.0/10044.7/100
Crime rate64.1 / 1k63.4 / 1k
Weather (desirability)18.0/10018.0/100
Parks & reserves—1
Walkability0.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities103
Green cover0.0%0.2%
Population9171,136
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/107/10

Comparison summary

Mulambin is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living, while Taroomball is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe. Where Mulambin is shaped by the coast, Taroomball offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

On the data, Mulambin is stronger for a quieter safety profile, plus nearby cafés and amenities; Taroomball answers with housing affordability, overall desirability, and a larger local community. On housing, Mulambin sits in a well priced band, compared with a gently premium feel in Taroomball.

Mulambin suits people chasing a beach lifestyle more clearly, whereas Taroomball is the stronger match for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons