Cooee Bay vs Taroomball, QLD Suburb Comparison

Cooee Bay for retirees and families; Taroomball for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cooee BayTaroomball

Overall score

Cooee Bay

37.4/100

Taroomball

38.7/100

Crime rate

Cooee Bay

63.2 / 1k

Taroomball

63.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cooee Bay

26

Taroomball

3

Population

Cooee Bay

942

Taroomball

1,136

Metric leadCooee Bay 6Taroomball 31 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCooee BayTaroomball
Overall score37.4/10038.7/100
Housing (desirability)53.6/10044.7/100
Crime rate63.2 / 1k63.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools2—
Weather (desirability)18.0/10018.0/100
Parks & reserves41
Walkability3.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities263
Green cover4.5%0.2%
Population9421,136
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/107/10

Comparison summary

Cooee Bay is a regional smaller community that feels self-contained without feeling remote, while Taroomball is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Cooee Bay tends to lead on parks and reserves, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Taroomball stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability. Cooee Bay generally means more approachable housing costs, while Taroomball leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Cooee Bay the better fit, while retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Taroomball.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons