Overall score
Brendale
59.3/100
Warner
48.2/100
Brendale for families and investment; Warner for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Brendale
59.3/100
Warner
48.2/100
Crime rate
Brendale
48.3 / 1k
Warner
48.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Brendale
175
Warner
124
Population
Brendale
3,100
Warner
12,264
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Brendale | Warner |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.3/100 | 48.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 79.4/100 | 50.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 48.3 / 1k | 48.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 22 | 17 |
| Walkability | 69.0/100 | 27.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 175 | 124 |
| Green cover | 1.3% | 11.1% |
| Population | 3,100 | 12,264 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 2/10 | 9/10 |
Put side by side, Brendale is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Warner is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Brendale is stronger for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability; Warner answers with parks and reserves, overall desirability, and a larger local community.
On balance, retirees and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Warner, while Brendale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.