Brendale vs Warner, QLD Suburb Comparison

Brendale for families and investment; Warner for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BrendaleWarner

Overall score

Brendale

59.3/100

Warner

48.2/100

Crime rate

Brendale

48.3 / 1k

Warner

48.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Brendale

175

Warner

124

Population

Brendale

3,100

Warner

12,264

Metric leadBrendale 5Warner 42 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBrendaleWarner
Overall score59.3/10048.2/100
Housing (desirability)79.4/10050.3/100
Crime rate48.3 / 1k48.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves26
Public transport stops2217
Walkability69.0/10027.5/100
Nearby amenities175124
Green cover1.3%11.1%
Population3,10012,264
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Brendale is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Warner is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Brendale is stronger for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability; Warner answers with parks and reserves, overall desirability, and a larger local community.

On balance, retirees and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Warner, while Brendale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons