Joyner vs Warner, QLD suburb comparison

Warner for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

JoynerWarner

Overall score

Joyner

46.4/100

Warner

61.9/100

Crime rate

Joyner

28.6 / 1k

Warner

28.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Joyner

25

Warner

121

Population

Joyner

3,600

Warner

12,264

Metric leadJoyner 0Warner 82 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryJoynerWarner
Overall score46.4/10061.9/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate28.6 / 1k28.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Parks & reserves46
Public transport stops917
Walkability13.5/10027.5/100
Nearby amenities25121
Population3,60012,264
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Joyner is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that balances access with everyday calm, while Warner is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Joyner sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Warner is in a middle-ring position.

Joyner tends to lead on good access to parks, while Warner stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access. On housing, Joyner sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Warner.

On balance, families and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Warner, while Joyner remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons