Cashmere vs Warner, QLD Suburb Comparison

Cashmere for schools; Warner for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CashmereWarner

Overall score

Cashmere

43.9/100

Warner

48.2/100

Crime rate

Cashmere

48.4 / 1k

Warner

48.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cashmere

2

Warner

124

Population

Cashmere

4,970

Warner

12,264

Metric leadCashmere 2Warner 81 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCashmereWarner
Overall score43.9/10048.2/100
Housing (desirability)21.6/10050.3/100
Crime rate48.4 / 1k48.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves26
Public transport stops217
Walkability3.0/10027.5/100
Nearby amenities2124
Green cover13.1%11.1%
Population4,97012,264
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Cashmere is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Warner is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Cashmere sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Warner is in a middle-ring position.

Cashmere pulls ahead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Warner is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.

Cashmere suits retirees more clearly, whereas Warner is the stronger match for families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons