Overall score
Cashmere
36.4/100
Warner
61.6/100
Cashmere vs Warner, QLD suburb comparison
Cashmere for retirees; Warner for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CashmereWarner
Crime rate
Cashmere
29.8 / 1k
Warner
29.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Cashmere
0
Warner
121
Population
Cashmere
4,970
Warner
12,264
Metric leadCashmere 1Warner 71 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Cashmere is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city, and Warner is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Cashmere sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Warner is in a middle-ring position.
Cashmere pulls ahead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Warner is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Cashmere suits retirees more clearly, whereas Warner is the stronger match for families and investors.