Cashmere vs Samsonvale, QLD Suburb Comparison

Cashmere for retirees; Samsonvale for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CashmereSamsonvale

Overall score

Cashmere

43.9/100

Samsonvale

54.4/100

Crime rate

Cashmere

48.4 / 1k

Samsonvale

12.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cashmere

2

Samsonvale

4

Population

Cashmere

4,970

Samsonvale

674

Metric leadCashmere 4Samsonvale 42 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCashmereSamsonvale
Overall score43.9/10054.4/100
Housing (desirability)21.6/10040.9/100
Crime rate48.4 / 1k12.9 / 1k
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves21
Public transport stops2—
Walkability3.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities24
Green cover13.1%0.1%
Population4,970674
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Cashmere is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Samsonvale is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds. Cashmere sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Samsonvale is within day-trip reach of the capital.

Cashmere pulls ahead on parks and reserves, walkability, and a larger local community, whereas Samsonvale is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Cashmere suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Samsonvale is the stronger match for retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons