Overall score
Kobble Creek
53.0/100
Samsonvale
54.4/100
Kobble Creek vs Samsonvale, QLD Suburb Comparison
Kobble Creek for families and investment; Samsonvale for retirees and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Kobble CreekSamsonvale
Crime rate
Kobble Creek
13.2 / 1k
Samsonvale
12.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kobble Creek
5
Samsonvale
4
Population
Kobble Creek
654
Samsonvale
674
Metric leadKobble Creek 4Samsonvale 33 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesSamsonvale
- Best for familiesKobble Creek
- Best for investmentKobble Creek
- Best for best valueKobble Creek
- Best for best schoolsSamsonvale
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kobble Creek | Samsonvale |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.0/100 | 54.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.9/100 | 40.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 13.2 / 1k | 12.9 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 5 | 4 |
| Green cover | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| Population | 654 | 674 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Kobble Creek reads as a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe; Samsonvale is a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds.
Kobble Creek pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Samsonvale is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and a larger local community.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Kobble Creek, while Samsonvale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.