Overall score
Kobble Creek
53.0/100
Mount Samson
54.3/100
Kobble Creek vs Mount Samson, QLD Suburb Comparison
Kobble Creek for schools; Mount Samson for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Kobble CreekMount Samson
Crime rate
Kobble Creek
13.2 / 1k
Mount Samson
13.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kobble Creek
5
Mount Samson
44
Population
Kobble Creek
654
Mount Samson
625
Metric leadKobble Creek 4Mount Samson 23 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMount Samson
- Best for familiesMount Samson
- Best for best schoolsKobble Creek
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kobble Creek | Mount Samson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.0/100 | 54.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.9/100 | 48.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 13.2 / 1k | 13.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 5 | 44 |
| Green cover | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| Population | 654 | 625 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Kobble Creek is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Mount Samson is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Samson sits among greener hillside streets, while Kobble Creek keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Kobble Creek is stronger for a quieter safety profile, overall desirability, and a larger local community; Mount Samson answers with nearby cafés and amenities.
Choose Kobble Creek if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Mount Samson for households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.