Overall score
Kobble Creek
53.0/100
Mount Glorious
55.6/100
Kobble Creek vs Mount Glorious, QLD Suburb Comparison
Kobble Creek for value; Mount Glorious for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Kobble CreekMount Glorious
Crime rate
Kobble Creek
13.2 / 1k
Mount Glorious
14.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kobble Creek
5
Mount Glorious
7
Population
Kobble Creek
654
Mount Glorious
343
Metric leadKobble Creek 5Mount Glorious 32 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for investmentMount Glorious
- Best for best valueKobble Creek
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kobble Creek | Mount Glorious |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.0/100 | 55.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.9/100 | 63.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 13.2 / 1k | 14.7 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 5 | 7 |
| Green cover | 0.2% | 0.1% |
| Population | 654 | 343 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Kobble Creek is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, while Mount Glorious is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Mount Glorious sits among greener hillside streets, while Kobble Creek keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Kobble Creek pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and overall desirability, whereas Mount Glorious is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Kobble Creek, while Mount Glorious remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.