Overall score
Closeburn
63.1/100
Mount Samson
57.6/100
Closeburn for retirees and families; Mount Samson for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Closeburn
63.1/100
Mount Samson
57.6/100
Crime rate
Closeburn
8.3 / 1k
Mount Samson
8.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Closeburn
14
Mount Samson
44
Population
Closeburn
562
Mount Samson
625
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Closeburn | Mount Samson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 63.1/100 | 57.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 73.3/100 | 91.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 8.3 / 1k | 8.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 14 | 44 |
| Population | 562 | 625 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Closeburn reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Mount Samson is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Samson sits among greener hillside streets, while Closeburn keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Closeburn is stronger for overall desirability; Mount Samson answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Closeburn suits families more clearly, whereas Mount Samson is the stronger match for retirees and investors.