Overall score
Closeburn
60.0/100
Mount Samson
54.3/100
Closeburn for families and investment; Mount Samson for value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Closeburn
60.0/100
Mount Samson
54.3/100
Crime rate
Closeburn
13.4 / 1k
Mount Samson
13.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Closeburn
14
Mount Samson
44
Population
Closeburn
562
Mount Samson
625
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Closeburn | Mount Samson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.0/100 | 54.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 42.2/100 | 48.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 13.4 / 1k | 13.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | — |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 14 | 44 |
| Green cover | 0.5% | 0.1% |
| Population | 562 | 625 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Closeburn reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Mount Samson is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Samson sits among greener hillside streets, while Closeburn keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Closeburn is stronger for a quieter safety profile and overall desirability; Mount Samson answers with housing affordability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community.
Closeburn suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Mount Samson is the stronger match for investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.