Cashmere vs Joyner, QLD suburb comparison

Cashmere for retirees; Joyner for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CashmereJoyner

Overall score

Cashmere

36.6/100

Joyner

46.4/100

Crime rate

Cashmere

28.5 / 1k

Joyner

28.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cashmere

0

Joyner

25

Population

Cashmere

4,970

Joyner

3,600

Metric leadCashmere 3Joyner 6across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCashmereJoyner
Overall score36.6/10046.4/100
Housing (desirability)36.5/10076.0/100
Crime rate28.5 / 1k28.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Parks & reserves24
Public transport stops29
Walkability3.0/10013.5/100
Nearby amenities025
Population4,9703,600
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Cashmere is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city, and Joyner is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that balances access with everyday calm.

On the data, Cashmere is stronger for a larger local community and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Joyner answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Cashmere sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Joyner.

Retirees and households prioritising schools may find Cashmere the better fit, while families and investors are more likely to prefer Joyner.

Related comparisons