Cashmere vs Joyner, QLD Suburb Comparison

Cashmere for retirees; Joyner for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CashmereJoyner

Overall score

Cashmere

43.9/100

Joyner

43.0/100

Crime rate

Cashmere

48.4 / 1k

Joyner

48.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cashmere

2

Joyner

29

Population

Cashmere

4,970

Joyner

3,600

Metric leadCashmere 4Joyner 61 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCashmereJoyner
Overall score43.9/10043.0/100
Housing (desirability)21.6/10046.4/100
Crime rate48.4 / 1k48.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves24
Public transport stops29
Walkability3.0/10013.5/100
Nearby amenities229
Green cover13.1%2.5%
Population4,9703,600
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Cashmere is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Joyner is a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand.

On the data, Cashmere is stronger for a larger local community and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Joyner answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access. On housing, Cashmere sits in a expensive band, compared with a gently premium feel in Joyner.

Retirees may find Cashmere the better fit, while families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Joyner.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons