Brinkin vs Wagaman, NT suburb comparison

Brinkin for retirees; Wagaman for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BrinkinWagaman

Overall score

Brinkin

43.2/100

Wagaman

46.7/100

Nearby amenities

Brinkin

102

Wagaman

178

Population

Brinkin

1,117

Wagaman

2,023

Metric leadBrinkin 2Wagaman 7across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBrinkinWagaman
Overall score43.2/10046.7/100
Housing (desirability)42.4/10050.1/100
Schools & preschools1015
Parks & reserves54
Public transport stops58
Walkability7.5/10014.0/100
Nearby amenities102178
Population1,1172,023
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Brinkin is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, and Wagaman is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Brinkin is stronger for parks and reserves and overall desirability; Wagaman answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Brinkin generally means more sought-after housing, while Wagaman leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Choose Brinkin if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Wagaman for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons