Overall score
Brinkin
46.5/100
Wagaman
39.2/100
Brinkin vs Wagaman, NT Suburb Comparison
Brinkin for retirees and schools; Wagaman for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BrinkinWagaman
Nearby amenities
Brinkin
112
Wagaman
182
Population
Brinkin
1,117
Wagaman
2,023
Metric leadBrinkin 5Wagaman 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Brinkin | Wagaman |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 46.5/100 | 39.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 35.6/100 | 34.5/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 15 |
| Weather (desirability) | 9.6/100 | 9.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | 8 |
| Walkability | 7.5/100 | 14.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 112 | 182 |
| Green cover | 26.4% | 4.1% |
| Population | 1,117 | 2,023 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 4/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Brinkin is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, and Wagaman is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Brinkin is stronger for parks and reserves, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage; Wagaman answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access. Brinkin generally means more sought-after housing, while Wagaman leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Choose Brinkin if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Wagaman for families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.