Overall score
Malak
47.7/100
Wagaman
44.5/100
Malak vs Wagaman, NT suburb comparison
Wagaman for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
MalakWagaman
Crime rate
Malak
1370.7 / 1k
Wagaman
2109.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Malak
300
Wagaman
178
Population
Malak
3,013
Wagaman
2,023
Metric leadMalak 7Wagaman 3across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
Comparison summary
Malak reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Wagaman is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Malak pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, whereas Wagaman is the better pick for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Malak generally means more approachable housing costs, while Wagaman leans toward more mid-market housing value.
Choose Malak if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Wagaman for retirees and investors.