Malak vs Wagaman, NT Suburb Comparison

Malak for retirees and investment; Wagaman for families and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MalakWagaman

Overall score

Malak

41.8/100

Wagaman

39.2/100

Nearby amenities

Malak

303

Wagaman

182

Population

Malak

3,013

Wagaman

2,023

Metric leadMalak 8Wagaman 21 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMalakWagaman
Overall score41.8/10039.2/100
Housing (desirability)37.2/10034.5/100
Schools & preschools915
Weather (desirability)9.6/1009.6/100
Parks & reserves64
Public transport stops208
Walkability30.0/10014.0/100
Nearby amenities303182
Green cover8.1%4.1%
Population3,0132,023
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/104/10

Comparison summary

Malak reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Wagaman is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Malak pulls ahead on parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Wagaman is the better pick for housing affordability, schools and education options, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Malak generally means more approachable housing costs, while Wagaman leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Wagaman, while Malak remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons