Millner vs Wagaman, NT suburb comparison

Wagaman for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MillnerWagaman

Overall score

Millner

50.5/100

Wagaman

46.7/100

Nearby amenities

Millner

87

Wagaman

178

Population

Millner

2,576

Wagaman

2,023

Metric leadMillner 5Wagaman 4across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMillnerWagaman
Overall score50.5/10046.7/100
Housing (desirability)27.1/10050.1/100
Schools & preschools715
Parks & reserves14
Public transport stops208
Walkability36.0/10014.0/100
Nearby amenities87178
Population2,5762,023
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Millner is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Wagaman is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Millner pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and public transport access, whereas Wagaman is the better pick for housing affordability and parks and reserves.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Wagaman, while Millner remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons