Marrara vs Wagaman, NT Suburb Comparison

Marrara for retirees and investment; Wagaman for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MarraraWagaman

Overall score

Marrara

55.4/100

Wagaman

39.2/100

Nearby amenities

Marrara

116

Wagaman

182

Population

Marrara

1,323

Wagaman

2,023

Metric leadMarrara 6Wagaman 31 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMarraraWagaman
Overall score55.4/10039.2/100
Housing (desirability)74.6/10034.5/100
Schools & preschools615
Weather (desirability)9.6/1009.6/100
Parks & reserves—4
Public transport stops168
Walkability68.0/10014.0/100
Nearby amenities116182
Green cover9.0%4.1%
Population1,3232,023
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Marrara is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby, and Wagaman is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Marrara pulls ahead on housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability, whereas Wagaman is the better pick for schools and education options, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community. Marrara generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Wagaman leans toward more mid-market housing value.

Choose Marrara if you are weighing retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Wagaman for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons