Overall score
Brownlow Hill
50.7/100
Werombi
56.4/100
Brownlow Hill vs Werombi, NSW Suburb Comparison
Brownlow Hill for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Brownlow HillWerombi
Crime rate
Brownlow Hill
22.3 / 1k
Werombi
22.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Brownlow Hill
15
Werombi
6
Population
Brownlow Hill
384
Werombi
941
Metric leadBrownlow Hill 5Werombi 42 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesBrownlow Hill
- Best for familiesBrownlow Hill
- Best for best schoolsBrownlow Hill
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Brownlow Hill | Werombi |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 50.7/100 | 56.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 38.4/100 | 40.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.3 / 1k | 22.3 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 35 | 18 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 27.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 15 | 6 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 11 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 13.0% |
| Population | 384 | 941 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Brownlow Hill reads as a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand; Werombi is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Brownlow Hill sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Werombi is more regionally self-contained.
Brownlow Hill tends to lead on public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Werombi stands out for overall desirability and a larger local community.
On balance, retirees, families, and investors are more likely to prefer Werombi, while Brownlow Hill remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.