Bundeena vs Port Hacking, NSW Suburb Comparison

Bundeena for retirees and families; Port Hacking for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

BundeenaPort Hacking

Overall score

Bundeena

64.1/100

Port Hacking

50.0/100

Crime rate

Bundeena

50.3 / 1k

Port Hacking

46.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Bundeena

159

Port Hacking

26

Population

Bundeena

2,103

Port Hacking

1,210

Metric leadBundeena 7Port Hacking 42 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryBundeenaPort Hacking
Overall score64.1/10050.0/100
Housing (desirability)49.8/10041.5/100
Crime rate50.3 / 1k46.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves44
Public transport stops306
Walkability82.0/10017.0/100
Nearby amenities15926
Planning activity1915
Green cover3.1%1.2%
Population2,1031,210
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Bundeena reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Port Hacking is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Bundeena sits among greener hillside streets, while Port Hacking keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Bundeena tends to lead on public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Port Hacking stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Port Hacking, while Bundeena remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons