Overall score
Bundeena
49.9/100
Port Hacking
40.4/100
Bundeena vs Port Hacking, NSW suburb comparison
Port Hacking for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BundeenaPort Hacking
Crime rate
Bundeena
50.3 / 1k
Port Hacking
46.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Bundeena
155
Port Hacking
26
Population
Bundeena
2,103
Port Hacking
1,210
Metric leadBundeena 5Port Hacking 51 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesPort Hacking
- Best for familiesPort Hacking
- Best for investmentPort Hacking
- Best for best valuePort Hacking
- Best for best schoolsPort Hacking
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Bundeena | Port Hacking |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 49.9/100 | 40.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 16.1/100 | 39.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 50.3 / 1k | 46.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 30 | 6 |
| Walkability | 82.0/100 | 17.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 155 | 26 |
| Planning activity | 15 | 11 |
| Population | 2,103 | 1,210 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Bundeena reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Port Hacking is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city. Bundeena sits among greener hillside streets, while Port Hacking keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Bundeena tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Port Hacking stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Choose Bundeena if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Port Hacking for retirees and families.