Overall score
Port Hacking
40.4/100
Woolooware
58.1/100
Port Hacking vs Woolooware, NSW suburb comparison
Port Hacking for retirees and investment; Woolooware for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Port HackingWoolooware
Crime rate
Port Hacking
46.7 / 1k
Woolooware
50.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Port Hacking
26
Woolooware
139
Population
Port Hacking
1,210
Woolooware
5,060
Metric leadPort Hacking 3Woolooware 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesPort Hacking
- Best for investmentPort Hacking
- Best for best schoolsWoolooware
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Port Hacking | Woolooware |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 40.4/100 | 58.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 39.8/100 | 16.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 46.7 / 1k | 50.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 13 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 64 |
| Walkability | 17.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 26 | 139 |
| Planning activity | 11 | 17 |
| Population | 1,210 | 5,060 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Port Hacking reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Woolooware is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Port Hacking sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Woolooware is in a middle-ring position.
Port Hacking tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Woolooware stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access.
Port Hacking suits retirees and investors more clearly, whereas Woolooware is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.