Caddens vs Werrington Downs, NSW Suburb Comparison

Caddens for families and schools; Werrington Downs for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CaddensWerrington Downs

Overall score

Caddens

43.6/100

Werrington Downs

37.0/100

Crime rate

Caddens

68.8 / 1k

Werrington Downs

68.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Caddens

136

Werrington Downs

31

Population

Caddens

3,487

Werrington Downs

3,221

Metric leadCaddens 7Werrington Downs 42 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCaddensWerrington Downs
Overall score43.6/10037.0/100
Housing (desirability)39.6/10052.2/100
Crime rate68.8 / 1k68.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools69
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves21
Public transport stops3328
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities13631
Planning activity132
Green cover12.7%7.5%
Population3,4873,221
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/106/10

Comparison summary

Caddens reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Werrington Downs is a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand. Caddens sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Werrington Downs is further out with more breathing room.

On the data, Caddens is stronger for parks and reserves, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities; Werrington Downs answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Caddens, while Werrington Downs remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons