Overall score
Camden Park
27.4/100
Razorback
40.1/100
Camden Park vs Razorback, NSW suburb comparison
Camden Park for retirees and families; Razorback for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Camden ParkRazorback
Crime rate
Camden Park
22.2 / 1k
Razorback
42.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Camden Park
0
Razorback
5
Population
Camden Park
2,233
Razorback
1,174
Metric leadCamden Park 3Razorback 51 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesCamden Park
- Best for familiesCamden Park
- Best for investmentRazorback
- Best for best valueRazorback
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Camden Park | Razorback |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 27.4/100 | 40.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 28.6/100 | 69.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.2 / 1k | 42.9 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | — |
| Public transport stops | 9 | 54 |
| Walkability | 13.5/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 5 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 21 |
| Population | 2,233 | 1,174 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Camden Park is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city, while Razorback is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Camden Park sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Razorback is more regionally self-contained.
On the data, Camden Park is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Razorback answers with housing affordability and public transport access.
Choose Camden Park if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Razorback for investors and value-focused buyers.