Camden Park vs Razorback, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Camden Park | Razorback |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 27.2/100 | 40.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 28.6/100 | 69.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 27.3 / 1k | 42.6 / 1k |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | — |
| Public transport stops | 9 | 54 |
| Walkability | 13.5/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 5 |
| Planning activity | 2 | 15 |
| Population | 2,233 | 1,174 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesCamden Park
- Best for familiesCamden Park
- Best for investmentRazorback
- Best for best valueRazorback
Comparison summary
Camden Park (NSW) and Razorback offer different strengths across official suburb data. Razorback leads on more comparison categories overall. Overall score favours Razorback; Housing (desirability) favours Razorback; Crime rate favours Camden Park (NSW). Quick verdicts: Retirees → Camden Park (NSW), Families → Camden Park (NSW), Investment → Razorback, Best value → Razorback.