Picton vs Razorback, NSW suburb comparison

Picton for families and value; Razorback for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PictonRazorback

Overall score

Picton

61.4/100

Razorback

40.1/100

Crime rate

Picton

43.0 / 1k

Razorback

42.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Picton

131

Razorback

5

Population

Picton

5,282

Razorback

1,174

Metric leadPicton 5Razorback 4across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPictonRazorback
Overall score61.4/10040.1/100
Housing (desirability)63.6/10069.4/100
Crime rate43.0 / 1k42.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools2
Parks & reserves8
Public transport stops22354
Walkability80.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities1315
Planning activity6321
Population5,2821,174
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Picton reads as a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood; Razorback is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Picton sits among greener hillside streets, while Razorback keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Picton is stronger for public transport access and walkability; Razorback answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Families and value-focused buyers may find Picton the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Razorback.

Related comparisons