Overall score
Mount Hunter
35.8/100
Picton
61.4/100
Mount Hunter for retirees and families; Picton for value and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Hunter
35.8/100
Picton
61.4/100
Crime rate
Mount Hunter
22.9 / 1k
Picton
43.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Hunter
2
Picton
131
Population
Mount Hunter
749
Picton
5,282
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Hunter | Picton |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.8/100 | 61.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 54.3/100 | 63.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.9 / 1k | 43.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 223 |
| Walkability | 24.0/100 | 80.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 2 | 131 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 63 |
| Population | 749 | 5,282 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 8/10 |
Mount Hunter is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, while Picton is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood.
On the data, Mount Hunter is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Picton answers with housing affordability and parks and reserves.
Retirees and families may find Mount Hunter the better fit, while value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Picton.