Mount Hunter vs Picton, NSW suburb comparison

Mount Hunter for retirees and families; Picton for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount HunterPicton

Overall score

Mount Hunter

35.8/100

Picton

61.4/100

Crime rate

Mount Hunter

22.9 / 1k

Picton

43.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Hunter

2

Picton

131

Population

Mount Hunter

749

Picton

5,282

Metric leadMount Hunter 2Picton 8across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount HunterPicton
Overall score35.8/10061.4/100
Housing (desirability)54.3/10063.6/100
Crime rate22.9 / 1k43.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools2
Parks & reserves18
Public transport stops16223
Walkability24.0/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities2131
Planning activity463
Population7495,282
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/108/10

Comparison summary

Mount Hunter is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, while Picton is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood.

On the data, Mount Hunter is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Picton answers with housing affordability and parks and reserves.

Retirees and families may find Mount Hunter the better fit, while value-focused buyers and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Picton.

Related comparisons