Cawdor vs Razorback, NSW suburb comparison

Cawdor for retirees and families; Razorback for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CawdorRazorback

Overall score

Cawdor

42.7/100

Razorback

40.1/100

Crime rate

Cawdor

21.4 / 1k

Razorback

42.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cawdor

2

Razorback

5

Population

Cawdor

430

Razorback

1,174

Metric leadCawdor 3Razorback 42 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCawdorRazorback
Overall score42.7/10040.1/100
Housing (desirability)59.2/10069.4/100
Crime rate21.4 / 1k42.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools1
Public transport stops4754
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities25
Planning activity221
Population4301,174
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Cawdor reads as a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city; Razorback is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace. Cawdor sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Razorback is more regionally self-contained.

On the data, Cawdor is stronger for a quieter safety profile and overall desirability; Razorback answers with housing affordability and public transport access.

Choose Cawdor if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Razorback for value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons