Cannington vs St James, WA suburb comparison

St James for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CanningtonSt James

Overall score

Cannington

61.1/100

St James

50.1/100

Crime rate

Cannington

1716.3 / 1k

St James

2392.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cannington

327

St James

49

Population

Cannington

6,875

St James

4,894

Metric leadCannington 7St James 3across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCanningtonSt James
Overall score61.1/10050.1/100
Housing (desirability)7.7/10019.9/100
Crime rate1716.3 / 1k2392.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools67
Parks & reserves147
Public transport stops3724
Walkability100.0/10072.0/100
Nearby amenities32749
Population6,8754,894
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Cannington is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and St James is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Cannington sits in a middle-ring position, whereas St James is closer to the city centre.

Cannington tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, while St James stands out for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Cannington sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in St James.

On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer St James, while Cannington remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons