Cannington vs St James, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Cannington | St James |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.3/100 | 47.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 7.7/100 | 19.9/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 37 | 24 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 72.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 327 | 49 |
| Population | 6,875 | 4,894 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Cannington is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and St James is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Cannington sits in a middle-ring position, whereas St James is closer to the city centre.
Cannington tends to lead on schools and education options and parks and reserves, while St James stands out for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Cannington sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in St James.
On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer St James, while Cannington remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.