Queens Park vs St James, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Queens Park | St James |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 55.8/100 | 47.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 28.4/100 | 19.9/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 56 | 24 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 72.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 130 | 49 |
| Population | 7,268 | 4,894 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesSt James
- Best for familiesQueens Park
- Best for investmentQueens Park
- Best for best valueQueens Park
- Best for best schoolsQueens Park
Comparison summary
Queens Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while St James is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Queens Park pulls ahead on housing affordability and schools and education options, whereas St James is the better pick for walkability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Queens Park sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in St James.
Families and investors may find Queens Park the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer St James.