Overall score
Queens Park
54.9/100
St James
50.2/100
Queens Park vs St James, WA suburb comparison
Queens Park for investment and value; St James for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Queens ParkSt James
Crime rate
Queens Park
1631.5 / 1k
St James
2392.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Queens Park
130
St James
49
Population
Queens Park
7,268
St James
4,894
Metric leadQueens Park 7St James 21 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesSt James
- Best for familiesSt James
- Best for investmentQueens Park
- Best for best valueQueens Park
- Best for best schoolsSt James
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Queens Park | St James |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.9/100 | 50.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 28.4/100 | 19.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 1631.5 / 1k | 2392.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 56 | 24 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 72.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 130 | 49 |
| Population | 7,268 | 4,894 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Queens Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while St James is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Queens Park pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas St James is the better pick for walkability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Queens Park sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in St James.
Families and investors may find Queens Park the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer St James.