Overall score
Queens Park
54.9/100
Wilson
52.9/100
Wilson for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Queens Park
54.9/100
Wilson
52.9/100
Crime rate
Queens Park
1631.5 / 1k
Wilson
1798.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Queens Park
130
Wilson
74
Population
Queens Park
7,268
Wilson
6,608
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Queens Park | Wilson |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.9/100 | 52.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 28.4/100 | 31.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 1631.5 / 1k | 1798.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 16 |
| Public transport stops | 56 | 37 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 34.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 130 | 74 |
| Population | 7,268 | 6,608 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 7/10 |
Queens Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Wilson is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Queens Park is stronger for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options; Wilson answers with housing affordability and parks and reserves.
Choose Queens Park if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Wilson for retirees and investors.