Ferndale vs Queens Park, WA suburb comparison

Ferndale for investment; Queens Park for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FerndaleQueens Park

Overall score

Ferndale

48.9/100

Queens Park

54.9/100

Crime rate

Ferndale

2822.6 / 1k

Queens Park

1631.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ferndale

120

Queens Park

130

Population

Ferndale

4,457

Queens Park

7,268

Metric leadFerndale 3Queens Park 61 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFerndaleQueens Park
Overall score48.9/10054.9/100
Housing (desirability)32.4/10028.4/100
Crime rate2822.6 / 1k1631.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools87
Parks & reserves98
Public transport stops3456
Walkability47.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities120130
Population4,4577,268
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/105/10

Comparison summary

Ferndale reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Queens Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Ferndale sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Queens Park is closer to the city centre.

Ferndale tends to lead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, while Queens Park stands out for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.

Investors may find Ferndale the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Queens Park.

Related comparisons