Overall score
Ferndale
48.9/100
Queens Park
54.9/100
Ferndale for investment; Queens Park for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Ferndale
48.9/100
Queens Park
54.9/100
Crime rate
Ferndale
2822.6 / 1k
Queens Park
1631.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Ferndale
120
Queens Park
130
Population
Ferndale
4,457
Queens Park
7,268
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Ferndale | Queens Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.9/100 | 54.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 32.4/100 | 28.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 2822.6 / 1k | 1631.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 8 |
| Public transport stops | 34 | 56 |
| Walkability | 47.0/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 120 | 130 |
| Population | 4,457 | 7,268 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 5/10 |
Ferndale reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Queens Park is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Ferndale sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Queens Park is closer to the city centre.
Ferndale tends to lead on housing affordability and parks and reserves, while Queens Park stands out for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.
Investors may find Ferndale the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Queens Park.