Ferndale vs St James, WA suburb comparison

Ferndale for investment and value; St James for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FerndaleSt James

Overall score

Ferndale

48.9/100

St James

50.2/100

Crime rate

Ferndale

2822.6 / 1k

St James

2392.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Ferndale

120

St James

49

Population

Ferndale

4,457

St James

4,894

Metric leadFerndale 5St James 5across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFerndaleSt James
Overall score48.9/10050.2/100
Housing (desirability)32.4/10019.9/100
Crime rate2822.6 / 1k2392.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools87
Parks & reserves97
Public transport stops3424
Walkability47.0/10072.0/100
Nearby amenities12049
Population4,4574,894
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Ferndale is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and St James is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Ferndale sits in a middle-ring position, whereas St James is closer to the city centre.

On the data, Ferndale is stronger for housing affordability and parks and reserves; St James answers with a quieter safety profile and walkability. Ferndale generally means more sought-after housing, while St James leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Ferndale the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer St James.

Related comparisons