Cardiff Heights vs Cardiff South, NSW Suburb Comparison

Cardiff Heights for retirees and families; Cardiff South for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Cardiff HeightsCardiff South

Overall score

Cardiff Heights

54.3/100

Cardiff South

41.1/100

Crime rate

Cardiff Heights

46.2 / 1k

Cardiff South

64.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Cardiff Heights

25

Cardiff South

40

Population

Cardiff Heights

1,384

Cardiff South

2,931

Metric leadCardiff Heights 6Cardiff South 34 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCardiff HeightsCardiff South
Overall score54.3/10041.1/100
Housing (desirability)68.5/10066.3/100
Crime rate46.2 / 1k64.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools88
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops3151
Walkability32.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities2540
Planning activity614
Green cover24.2%4.4%
Population1,3842,931
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Cardiff Heights is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks, and Cardiff South is a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand. Cardiff Heights sits among greener hillside streets, while Cardiff South keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Cardiff Heights is stronger for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Cardiff South answers with housing affordability, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Cardiff Heights the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Cardiff South.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons