Caversham vs Guildford, WA suburb comparison

Caversham for investment and value; Guildford for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CavershamGuildford

Overall score

Caversham

61.2/100

Guildford

50.2/100

Crime rate

Caversham

1215.9 / 1k

Guildford

4565.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Caversham

87

Guildford

70

Population

Caversham

7,419

Guildford

2,040

Metric leadCaversham 8Guildford 2across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCavershamGuildford
Overall score61.2/10050.2/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10021.8/100
Crime rate1215.9 / 1k4565.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools13
Parks & reserves155
Public transport stops3123
Walkability61.0/10034.0/100
Nearby amenities8770
Population7,4192,040
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Caversham is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Guildford is a well-serviced metro smaller community with plenty happening nearby.

Caversham tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Guildford stands out for schools and education options and stronger socioeconomic advantage.

Caversham suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Guildford is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons