Overall score
Caversham
61.2/100
Woodbridge
43.6/100
Caversham for retirees and investment; Woodbridge for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Caversham
61.2/100
Woodbridge
43.6/100
Crime rate
Caversham
1215.9 / 1k
Woodbridge
7660.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Caversham
87
Woodbridge
35
Population
Caversham
7,419
Woodbridge
1,207
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Caversham | Woodbridge |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.2/100 | 43.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 76.0/100 | 9.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 1215.9 / 1k | 7660.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 15 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 31 | 16 |
| Walkability | 61.0/100 | 24.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 87 | 35 |
| Population | 7,419 | 1,207 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 6/10 |
Put side by side, Caversham is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Woodbridge is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Woodbridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Caversham keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Caversham pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Woodbridge is the better pick for schools and education options.
On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Caversham, while Woodbridge remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.