Caversham vs Woodbridge, WA suburb comparison

Caversham for retirees and investment; Woodbridge for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CavershamWoodbridge

Overall score

Caversham

61.2/100

Woodbridge

43.6/100

Crime rate

Caversham

1215.9 / 1k

Woodbridge

7660.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Caversham

87

Woodbridge

35

Population

Caversham

7,419

Woodbridge

1,207

Metric leadCaversham 9Woodbridge 1across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCavershamWoodbridge
Overall score61.2/10043.6/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/1009.6/100
Crime rate1215.9 / 1k7660.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools16
Parks & reserves154
Public transport stops3116
Walkability61.0/10024.0/100
Nearby amenities8735
Population7,4191,207
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Caversham is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Woodbridge is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace. Woodbridge sits among greener hillside streets, while Caversham keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Caversham pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Woodbridge is the better pick for schools and education options.

On balance, retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Caversham, while Woodbridge remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons